A short discourse on sexuality

What is called natural? What's the criteria to be called 'natural'?
The most suitable answer can be something common over a period of time is natural.

In the Vedas (which I solely refer for spiritual knowledge and not as a code of conduct) it is implied that three things in the universe have no reason; Marriage, Life & Birth (All three are connected to each other).
The marriage of a man & woman leads to procreation. My question is are all of us here for procreation?
In Jewish religion celibacy is prohibited, then why Jesus was unmarried? And if I were to evoke the conspiracy theories of Mary Magdalene then things would become unnecessarily controversial.
In Hinduism, there have been 'Brahmachari' who are life long celibates. And that's accepted despite they don't procreate. Even in Christianity Papal candidates have to be celibate. Yes, homophobics can give an argument that because Brahmacharis & Popes have to lead an ascetic life that's why they leave the worldly pleasure but if we don't lead an ascetic life does that mean we have to procreate. And some people have such a misfortune that despite being married they remain childless (baanjh)!
My point is who exactly governs us? Who sets these code of conducts?
Yes, again homophobics can give the argument that Majority wins. Then why are Sikh people not penalized for not wearing helmets on the Indian roads? The answer is sad; here its a question of religion and not sex (sexual preference) that's why!
If we assume people with uncommon sexual orientation (did I just coin a new term?) are in minority then they should be given protection.
But indeed that's not the case. U know y? Coz it aint ques of rlgn bt sex!

So the demand of time is to create sexual awareness.


But that's not the only thing I have to say. I even understand the plea of all the Indians when it comes to sexual liberalization. (...to be contd)